Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. KOQw

Recently, environmental issues have become more serious than before. Some would say that each person who lives in the world can contribute to these problems, but others disagree. This essay will explore both views. It is clear that everyone can take action to deal with environmental issues. Because lots of research found several ways for saving the global environment. A good example is recycling, which people already have done. In addition, avoiding plastic materials is beneficial, the reason why it generates toxic gases, so currently, people have started to use eco-bags for shopping, and wooden straws for drinking beverages. Thus, individuals are able to promote the environment with eco-friendly actions. It is also true that many ecological activities are organised by ordinary people or organizations who not relating to governments. For instance, one Japanese association has planted a huge amount of trees to reforest. Furthermore, in Okinawa, local citizens pick up garages and maintain corals to reserve the beautiful coral reef. Therefore, non-governmental organizations and even locals can develop and protect precious environments. On the other hand, it is undoubtful that governments have a massive impact on people's behavior. It means that they can regulate citizens what they want to. For example, they can legislate new laws to combat environmental issues. Also, they can launch public campaigns with national expenses to encourage locals to take action to contribute to these issues. Hence, governments are the most powerful organizations to do something to improve global environmental issues. In conclusion, individuals are able to contribute to environmental problems as well as governments, such as recycling, avoiding plastics, and planting trees. It is my brief that governments should assist each person's action financially. Perhaps, more and more people will have taken action to save the global environment.

Recently, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrealsubstantialnatural
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
 have become more serious than This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 would say that each person who This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :resides
lives
 in the world can contribute to these problems, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 others disagree. This essay will explore both views.

It is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that everyone can take You use this word too often, consider replacing it withreactionlifeforcedealprocessplan
action
 to deal with You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrealsubstantialnatural
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
Because
 lots of research found several ways for saving the global environment. A This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 example is recycling, which You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 already have done. In addition
, avoiding plastic materials is beneficial, the reason why it generates toxic gases, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
currently
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 have This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiated
started
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
Possible spelling mistake found.combatsscumbags
eco-bags
 for shopping, and wooden straws for drinking beverages. Thus
, individuals are able to promote the environment with eco-friendly actions.

It is also
 true that This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 ecological activities are Possible spelling mistake. 'organised' is British English.organized
organised
 by ordinary You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 or organizations who not relating to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
. For instance
, one Japanese association has planted a huge amount of trees to reforest. Furthermore
, in Okinawa, local citizens pick up garages and maintain corals to reserve the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :gorgeousstunning
beautiful
 coral reef. Therefore
, non-governmental organizations and even locals can develop and protect precious environments.

On the other hand
, it is Possible spelling mistake found.doubtful
undoubtful
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
 have a massive impact on This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
's behavior. It means that they can regulate citizens what they want to. For example
, they can legislate new laws to combat You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrealsubstantialnatural
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
. Also
, they can launch public campaigns with national expenses to encourage locals to take You use this word too often, consider replacing it withreactionlifeforcedealprocessplan
action
 to contribute to these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withaffairpointquestionargumentcontroversytopic
issues
. Hence
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
 are the most powerful organizations to do something to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :ameliorate
improve
 global You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrealsubstantialnatural
environmental
 issues.

In conclusion
, individuals are able to contribute to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrealsubstantialnatural
environmental
 problems as well
 as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
, such as recycling, avoiding plastics, and planting trees. It is my brief that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
 should assist each person's You use this word too often, consider replacing it withreactionlifeforcedealprocessplan
action
financially
. Perhaps, more and more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 will have taken You use this word too often, consider replacing it withreactionlifeforcedealprocessplan
action
 to save the global environment. 