In western countries, the number of old age homes is burgeoning on the every other day. Who is more responsible for the expense spent behind care of old people and maintenance of these dwellings? An individual, whose existence is because of these suffering people, or the authority which ought to look after every citizen’s well fare. I am strongly in support with the former one.
Every human being is becoming greedy and self-centered in the modern society. I believe that not only on Britain, but in each country in the globe, elders prefer to live in the rest houses due to the fact that, in retirement homes they find company of the same age group. Whereas at own home retired person feel lonely as his children are busy in their own life and occupational burdens. Moreover, convalescent shelters provide all the prerequisites to all members such as food, professional health care and entertainment. Which, young generation may not be able to facilitate at the house. For example, a 75 year old woman is paralyzed, and she needs 24*7 observations which are definitely not feasible for her next generation. In such cases, allowing her at place where professionals can take care is the best. Hence, retirement facilities work for every elder person. However, it does not mean that an individual should not be responsible for his guardian’s expenses.
Father and mother spend their entire lives in upbringing of their toddlers. To illustrate, to own foreign degree in man’s hand, a father may sell his land which is a heritage of his forefathers. On the contrary, if youth decides that looking after his parents are not his liability then it’s certainly prejudice to parent’s oblations. Thus, old timer’s care in elder homes should be expended by their children.
In addition, the government should also look for well being of this geriatric group because many couples are infertile, who assuredly needs ministry’s support in their last time.
To summarize, I stick to my opinion that it’s civilian’s duty to guard their nurture directly or indirectly. Still, the cabinet should also take initiative to pay when required
In western countries, the number of
old
age
homes
is burgeoning on the every other day. Who is more responsible for the expense spent behind
care
of
old
people
and maintenance of these dwellings? An individual, whose existence is
because
of these suffering
people
, or the authority which ought to look after every citizen’s well fare. I am
strongly
in support with the former one.
Every human being is becoming greedy and self-centered in the modern society. I believe that not
only
on Britain,
but
in each country in the globe, elders prefer to
live
in the rest
houses
due to the fact that, in retirement
homes
they find
company
of the same age group. Whereas at
own
home retired person feel lonely as his children are busy in their
own
life and occupational burdens.
Moreover
, convalescent shelters provide all the prerequisites to all members such as food, professional health
care
and entertainment.
Which
, young generation may not be able to facilitate at the
house
.
For example
, a 75 year
old
woman
is paralyzed
, and she needs
24*7
observations which are definitely not feasible for her
next
generation. In such cases, allowing her at place where professionals can take
care
is the best.
Hence
, retirement facilities work for every elder person.
However
, it does not mean that an individual should not be responsible for his guardian’s expenses.
Father and mother spend their entire
lives
in upbringing of their toddlers. To illustrate, to
own
foreign degree in
man
’s hand, a father may sell his land which is a heritage of his forefathers.
On the contrary
, if youth decides that looking after his parents are not his liability then it’s
certainly
prejudice
to parent’s oblations.
Thus
,
old
timer’s
care
in elder
homes
should
be expended
by their children.
In addition
, the
government
should
also
look for
well being
of this geriatric group
because
many
couples are infertile, who
assuredly
needs ministry’s support in their last time.
To summarize
, I stick to my opinion that it’s civilian’s duty to guard their nurture
directly
or
indirectly
.
Still
, the cabinet should
also
take initiative to pay when required