Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music, film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no public or government restrictions on what they do.

Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music, film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no public or government restrictions on what they do. GMJDQ

This is a highly controversial issue whether original artists should be given the absolute privilege to express their ideas through their works or not. Few people believe that the government should not impose any constraints on the inventive people's work whereas many others contradict the idea. Both groups have several logical arguments to support their views. I will discuss both views in this essay, but I feel that creative artists should not have any boundaries until they badly hurt society or people’s feelings with their work. First of all, some people are innovative and they represent the arts through their works. We should not restrict them by country or religious boundary. We have to give them ample space to get the best work from them. For example, M. F Hussain, who was the greatest Indian painter, had drawn the diagram of many old and modern inventions including smartphones before they became reality. At that particular time, nobody could even imagine that human beings will have all the access to the information on their palm. These people are ahead of their time. They imagine the world far ahead of their generation. If we stuck them with laws and rules, they won't be able to give us masterpieces of their works. On the other hand, some artists are influenced by political motives and personal success and they create some controversial issues that might hurt the society and religious sentiments of people. Although, these are also considered as noble creations, where a small number of people do appreciate the idea, while mass people are hurt by it. So, the government should have watchful eyes to a certain extent to avoid any grudge in society. In conclusion, I would say, artists, should be free in their creative works, but must work with more responsibility, and not create any controversial thing which may bring negative impact to the society.

This is a highly
 controversial issue whether original You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinventorartisancomposerpainterexpert
artists
 should be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 the absolute privilege to express their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtsconceptsnotions
ideas
 through their works or not. Few You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 believe that the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 should not impose any constraints on the inventive This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
's You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtaskindustrytrialjobproductionstruggle
work
 whereas This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 others contradict the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
. Both groups have several logical arguments to support their views. I will discuss both views in this essay, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 I feel that creative You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinventorartisancomposerpainterexpert
artists
 should not have any boundaries until they badly
 hurt society or You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people’s
 feelings with their work.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".First
First of all
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 are Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).innovative, and
innovative and
 they represent the arts through their works. We should not restrict them by country or religious boundary. We This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 give them ample space to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 the best You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtaskindustrytrialjobproductionstruggle
work
 from them. For example
, M. F Hussain, who was the greatest Indian painter, had drawn the diagram of This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ancientagedmature
old
 and modern inventions including smartphones This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
 they became reality. At that particular time, nobody could even imagine that human beings will have all the access to the information on their palm. These You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 are ahead of their time. They imagine the world far ahead of their generation. If we stuck them with laws and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :requirements
rules
, they won't be able to give us masterpieces of their works.

On the other hand
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinventorartisancomposerpainterexpert
artists
are influenced
 by political motives and personal Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).success, and
success and
 they create This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 controversial issues that might hurt the society and religious sentiments of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
. Although, these are also
 considered as noble creations, where a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
small
 number of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 do appreciate the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
, while mass You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
are hurt
 by it. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 should have watchful eyes to a certain extent to avoid any grudge in society.

In conclusion
, I would say, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withinventorartisancomposerpainterexpert
artists
, should be free in their creative works, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withtaskindustrytrialjobproductionstruggle
work
 with more responsibility, and not create any controversial thing which may bring This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 impact to the society. 