Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. r86l2
The line graph provides information about the contamination level in London from 1600 to 2000. The data are measured in metre. Overall, it can be seen that, sulphur dioxide was considerably higher than that of smoke pollution throughout the period. To begin with, in terms of sulphur dioxide, the level of dirtying was increasing steadily from 0 to around 600 per cubic metre in the first three years. Likewise, the ratio was peaked out in mid year(1725) approximately 750 per cubic metre. Although it was increasing, chemical ratio decreased slowly in the year 1759 comprised to less than 750 cubic metre. Moreover, the number of sulpheric acid was fluctuated at the last year around 500 to o per cubic metre. Furthermore, the level of smoke in London was started from 0 metre in 1600 and rapidly increased up to the year 1900 with the number of rouhly 250 per cubic metre. In addition, the smoke rates in the London fluctuated between 250 to 100 per cubic metre prior to 1950, before droping sharply to merely o per cubic in the year 2000 as shown in figure.
The line graph provides information about the contamination level in London from 1600 to 2000. The data
are measured
in
Possible spelling mistake. 'metre' is British English.
metre
.

Overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that,
Possible spelling mistake. 'sulphur' is British English.
sulphur
dioxide was
considerably
higher than that of smoke pollution throughout the period.

To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, in terms of
Possible spelling mistake. 'sulphur' is British English.
sulphur
dioxide, the level of dirtying was increasing
steadily
from 0 to around 600 per cubic
Possible spelling mistake. 'metre' is British English.
metre
in the
first
three years.
Likewise
, the ratio
was peaked
out in mid
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year(1725)
approximately 750 per cubic
Possible spelling mistake. 'metre' is British English.
metre
. Although it was increasing, chemical ratio decreased
slowly
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
1759 comprised to less than 750 cubic
Possible spelling mistake. 'metre' is British English.
metre
.
Moreover
, the number of
Possible spelling mistake found.
sulpheric
acid
was fluctuated
at the last
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
around 500 to o per cubic
Possible spelling mistake. 'metre' is British English.
metre
.

Furthermore
, the level of smoke in London was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
started
from 0
Possible spelling mistake. 'metre' is British English.
metre
in 1600 and
rapidly
increased up to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
1900 with the number of
Possible spelling mistake found.
rouhly
250 per cubic
Possible spelling mistake. 'metre' is British English.
metre
.
In addition
, the smoke rates in the London fluctuated
Use "between" + "and" not "to." Try this: "between 250 and 100".
between 250 to 100
per cubic
Possible spelling mistake. 'metre' is British English.
metre
prior to 1950,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
Possible spelling mistake found.
droping
sharply
to
merely
o per cubic in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
2000 as shown in figure.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
186 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.