Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Comparison of Energy Production. The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production

Comparison of Energy Production. The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production 5kgNQ
The pie charts compare the amounts of four different types of energy production in 1995 and 2005. Overall, it can be observed that the most substantial sources of energy in both years were gas and coal, which represented more than half of total energy production, whereas petrol and other types of energy sources produced the lowest amount of energy. Nevertheless, over a ten-year period, in all kinds of energy production, there was a marginal change. It is obvious that coal is one of the leading sources of energy production. If in 1995 the energy produced by coal was 29. 80%, then in 2005 this figure increased merely to 1% (30. 93%). As for gas, it is the second leading source of energy production. In 1995, its production generated 29. 63%, and 10 years later, this number slightly increased to 30. 31%. Regarding the remaining energy sources, production of nuclear power and other types of energy sources increased by 5%, which amounted to 10. 10% and 9. 10%, respectively. Moreover, petrol was the only source of energy, the production of which decreased from 29. 27% in 1995 to 9. 72% (19. 55%) in 2005.
The pie charts compare the amounts of four
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
in 1995 and 2005.
Overall
, it can
be observed
that the most substantial
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in both years were gas and coal, which represented more than half of total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
, whereas petrol and other types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
produced the lowest amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
.
Nevertheless
, over a ten-year period, in all kinds of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
, there was a marginal
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
. It is obvious that coal is one of the leading
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
.
“If” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
If
in 1995 the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
produced by coal was 29. 80%, then in 2005 this figure increased
merely
to 1% (30. 93%). As for gas, it is the second leading
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
. In 1995, its
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
generated 29. 63%, and 10 years later, this number
slightly
increased to 30. 31%. Regarding the remaining
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of nuclear power and other types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sources
increased by 5%, which amounted to 10. 10% and 9. 10%,
respectively
.
Moreover
, petrol was the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
source
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
of which decreased from 29. 27% in 1995 to 9. 72% (19. 55%) in 2005.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic Comparison of Energy Production. The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production

Academic
  American English
1 paragraphs
193 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Comparison of Energy Production. The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production