Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

According to the reading passage, three names are proposed as the potential authors of the Voynich manuscript, a weird and mysterious book written on vellum that looks like 16th century's books.

According to the reading passage, three names are proposed as the potential authors of the Voynich manuscript, a weird and mysterious book written on vellum that looks like 16th century's books. r8b7J
According to the reading passage, three names are proposed as the potential authors of the Voynich manuscript, a weird and mysterious book written on vellum that looks like 16th century's books. However, the listening passage disagrees with the ideas put forward in the reading passage. In the line with the author's attitude, Anthony Ascham could be the writer of the manuscript and because of that the manuscript could be a scientific subject hidden in the codes. In contrast, the lecturer rejects the claim raised in the reading passage and sets out some information about the Ascham's inferior jobs and books back then which crosses his name out as a possible candidate for such powerful manuscript. Moreover, the writer believes that this manuscript is without meaning or is fake, and Edward Kelley wrote it to took money from rich people by pretending that the manuscript was so magical. On the other hand, the speaker argues that, 400 years ago, the general knowledge of the people was low and there was no need for a delinquent to put lots of efforts on writing such an amazing manuscript. Building upon this fact, this theory is also off the table. Furthermore, the lecturer calls into question the point presented by the writer that, Wilfird Voynich himself wrote the manuscript in order to gain some respect and reputation. Ironically, on the basis of the speaker's assert, one could see that, the vellum and the ink used in the manuscript are aged about 400 years that makes it impossible for the Voynich to create the book. As a recap, although the reading passage provides some evidence to support the idea that whether Ascham, Kelley or Voynich are the possible authors of a found enigmatic manuscript resorting to some theories, the listening passage challenges these indications and opposes this conclusion.
According to the
reading
passage
, three names
are proposed
as the potential authors of the
Voynich
manuscript
, a weird and mysterious book written on vellum that looks like 16th century's books.
However
, the listening
passage
disagrees with the
ideas
put forward in the
reading
passage.

In the line with the author's attitude, Anthony
Ascham
could be the writer of the
manuscript
and
because
of that the
manuscript
could be a scientific subject hidden in the codes.
In contrast
, the lecturer rejects the claim raised in the
reading
passage
and sets out
some
information about the
Ascham
's inferior jobs and books back then which crosses his name out as a possible candidate for such powerful manuscript.

Moreover
, the writer believes that this
manuscript
is without meaning or is fake, and Edward Kelley wrote it to took money from rich
people
by pretending that the
manuscript
was
so
magical.
On the other hand
, the speaker argues that, 400 years ago, the general knowledge of the
people
was low and there was no need for a delinquent to put lots of efforts on writing such an amazing
manuscript
. Building upon this fact, this theory is
also
off the table.

Furthermore
, the lecturer calls into question the point presented by the writer that,
Wilfird
Voynich
himself wrote the
manuscript
in order to gain
some
respect and reputation.
Ironically
, on the basis of the speaker's assert, one could
see
that, the vellum and the ink
used
in the
manuscript
are aged
about 400 years that
makes
it impossible for the
Voynich
to create the book.

As a recap, although the
reading
passage
provides
some
evidence to support the
idea
that whether
Ascham
, Kelley or
Voynich
are the possible authors of a found enigmatic
manuscript
resorting to
some
theories, the listening
passage
challenges these indications and opposes this conclusion.

IELTS academic According to the reading passage, three names are proposed as the potential authors of the Voynich manuscript, a weird and mysterious book written on vellum that looks like 16th century's books.

Academic
  American English
5 paragraphs
303 words
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: