Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the technique called cloud seeding, which is used for reducing the formation of hail. The author believes that the cloud seeding is an advantageous way to hail prevention and provides three reasons to support hisher idea, whereas the lecturer refutes each of the claim made in the article.
To begin with, the speaker disagrees that the conclusion from the laboratory is fair. The professor admits that the outcome of experiments might be true, however, the cloud seeding can prevent any form of precipitation. Hence, the utilization of cloud seeding is also able to cause the lacking of water, bringing the drought.
Moreover, the lecturer disproves that the finding from Asia can convince the effectiveness of cloud seeding. She points out that the experiments are carried in the area of cities only. The area of urban produce a numerous of pollution which could offer a favor situation for the using of cloud seeding. On the contrary, this experiment could not be repeated in the unpolluted farm in US.
Finally, the professor doubts that the information from local studies show the cloud seeding is really counts. She mentions that not only the decreasing damage from hail happened in local, but also occurred in neighbouring area, such as east, northwest, etc. Natural variation would be the main factor rather than the using of cloud seeding. Therefore, the studies from local also seem incorrect.
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss the technique called
cloud
seeding, which is
used
for reducing the formation of hail. The author believes that the
cloud
seeding is an advantageous way to hail prevention and provides three reasons to support
hisher
idea
, whereas the lecturer refutes each of the claim made in the article.
To
begin
with, the speaker disagrees that the conclusion from the laboratory is
fair
. The professor admits that the outcome of experiments might be true,
however
, the
cloud
seeding can
prevent
any form of precipitation.
Hence
, the utilization of
cloud
seeding is
also
able to cause the lacking of water, bringing the drought.
Moreover
, the lecturer disproves that the finding from Asia can convince the effectiveness of
cloud
seeding. She points out that the experiments
are carried
in the area of cities
only
. The area of urban produce
a numerous of
pollution which could offer a favor situation for the using of
cloud
seeding.
On the contrary
, this experiment could not
be repeated
in the unpolluted farm in US.
Finally
, the professor doubts that the information from local studies
show
the
cloud
seeding is
really
counts. She mentions that not
only
the decreasing damage from hail happened in local,
but
also
occurred in
neighbouring
area, such as east, northwest, etc. Natural variation would be the main factor
rather
than the using of
cloud
seeding.
Therefore
, the studies from local
also
seem incorrect.