When it comes to development, a growing number of cities are facing the problem of space constraint and therefore, are modernizing by constructing new buildings in place of old ones. However, there are few disadvantages of removing old complexes such as destroying the history associated with them and negative impact on tourism.
Firstly, whenever an old construction is completed demolished, with it demolishes the entire history behind that building. Some of the ancient cities such as Rome and Athens are hugely popular only on account of the medieval architectural marvels they possess. These structures are the cities’ very essence and are, in fact, akin to their heartbeat. If old palaces and churches are destroyed only to replace with modern architecture, the city’s charm is at risk of being lost. Moreover, the history of any country can be understood to a great extent by the kind of architecture it had and the technology used by the people in that era which can be learned through such buildings.
Secondly, removing old complexes can also lead to a gradual downfall in tourism. As most of the contemporary cities are developed only in the last century, there are only a handful of cities which still hold age old infrastructures. If these are not preserved, it will definitely have an adverse impact on world tourism.
On the other hand, improved safety is the key advantage when we consider modern infrastructure. Many of the old buildings might have been damaged over the period of time and can pose a serious risk to the visitors as well as people living in the vicinity. Replacing them with new ones can help bring in improved safety standards.
To conclude, I do not think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. While safety is a very important issue, it can also be achieved by renovating old complexes and not necessarily taking them down completely. This can ensure the heritage is maintained without compromising on safety.
When it
comes
to development, a growing number of
cities
are facing the problem of space constraint and
therefore
, are modernizing by constructing new buildings in place of
old
ones
.
However
, there are few disadvantages of removing
old
complexes such as destroying the history associated with them and
negative
impact on tourism.
Firstly
, whenever an
old
construction
is completed
demolished, with it demolishes the entire history behind that building.
Some of the
ancient
cities
such as Rome and Athens are
hugely
popular
only
on account of the medieval architectural marvels they possess. These structures are the
cities’
very
essence and are, in fact, akin to their heartbeat. If
old
palaces and churches are
destroyed
only
to replace with modern architecture, the city’s charm is at
risk
of
being lost
.
Moreover
, the history of any country can
be understood
to a great extent by the kind of architecture it had and the technology
used
by the
people
in that era which can
be learned
through such buildings.
Secondly
, removing
old
complexes can
also
lead to a gradual downfall in tourism. As most of the contemporary
cities
are developed
only
in the last century, there are
only
a
handful
of
cities
which
still
hold age
old
infrastructures. If these are not preserved, it will definitely have an adverse impact on world tourism.
On the other hand
,
improved
safety
is the key advantage when we consider modern infrastructure.
Many
of the
old
buildings might have
been damaged
over the period of time and can pose a serious
risk
to the visitors
as well
as
people
living in the vicinity. Replacing them with new
ones
can
help
bring in
improved
safety
standards.
To conclude
, I do not
think
the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. While
safety
is a
very
important
issue, it can
also
be achieved
by renovating
old
complexes and not
necessarily
taking them down completely. This can ensure the heritage
is maintained
without compromising on
safety
.