Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experience. v.1

Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. v. 1
With the evolution of technology, the mode of transportation has been drastically shifted from land to aerial. To meet the growing demand of the era, the aviation industry is continuously improvising its technology and infrastructure, compromising with the health of the environment. Many people are of the belief that imposing a heavy tax on passengers might limit the air traffic. However, I am of the opposite opinion due to its significant repercussions. This essay sheds some lights on how taxing would not really help in resolving this global issue. Firstly, business nowadays is spread across the globe and travelling overseas has become an integral part of it. Expensive and inconvenient travel will hit the speed and ease of international and national business, thereby slowing down the professional affairs across countries. For example, startups and small scale industries might will fail to compete in the international market by not being able to afford a faster and convenient commute. Hence, demoting air travel is not an ideal solution. Furthermore, travel and tourism plays a crucial role in a country’s economy by creating jobs and contributing to sales, profits and revenues. An expensive air fare will definitely result in a noticeable fall in foreign travellers, thereby resulting a noticeable economic slowdown. For instance, island countries such as the Maldives and Mauritius will be majorly impacted, whose economy is entirely dependent on foreign travellers and the only mode of transport is aerial. Thus, taxing wouldn’t really beat this issue. To summarize, the significant increase in air traffic is indeed polluting our environment, but imposing heavy tax would not resolve the primary issue. Rather, the Government should leverage technologies to promote environment-friendly transport systems and minimize the pollution caused by the aviation industry.
With the evolution of technology, the mode of transportation has been
drastically
shifted from land to aerial. To
meet
the growing demand of the era, the aviation industry is
continuously
improvising its technology and infrastructure, compromising with the health of the environment.
Many
people
are of the belief that imposing a heavy tax on passengers might limit the
air
traffic.
However
, I am of the opposite opinion due to its significant repercussions. This essay sheds
some
lights on how taxing would not
really
help
in resolving this global issue.

Firstly
, business nowadays
is spread
across the globe and travelling overseas has become an integral part of it. Expensive and inconvenient travel will hit the speed and
ease
of international and national business, thereby slowing down the professional affairs across countries.
For example
, startups and
small
scale industries might will fail to compete in the international market by not being able to afford a faster and convenient commute.
Hence
, demoting
air
travel is not an ideal solution.

Furthermore
, travel and tourism plays a crucial role in a country’s economy by creating jobs and contributing to sales, profits and revenues. An expensive
air
fare will definitely result in a noticeable fall in foreign
travellers
, thereby resulting a noticeable economic slowdown.
For instance
, island countries such as the Maldives and Mauritius will be
majorly
impacted, whose economy is
entirely
dependent on foreign
travellers
and the
only
mode of transport is aerial.
Thus
, taxing wouldn’t
really
beat this issue.

To summarize
, the significant increase in
air
traffic is
indeed
polluting our environment,
but
imposing heavy tax would not resolve the primary issue.
Rather
, the
Government
should leverage technologies to promote environment-friendly transport systems and minimize the pollution caused by the aviation industry.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes

IELTS essay Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
288 words
8.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts